Inclusão e direitos sociais: a parceria público-privada na promoção de projetos via terceiro setor

Abstract

This doctoral thesis aims to make a critical reflection on inclusive educational projects, made possible through the public-private partnership, respecting social rights, presenting the Third Sector as the main actor, and with the perspective of education against barbarism as a central point. Education must avoid barbarism and seek human emancipation, as opposed to the society that kills and trivializes exclusion, as well as the patch on the times we live in, in which the logic of capital is exclusive and aims to equal everyone, making it impossible to legitimize social rights. This diversity of options was discussed in the light of Adorno's complex thinking, as the main lens for the problematizing of inclusion in education from the perspective of both the private and public sectors, respecting social rights, in addition to Mantoan and Damasceno, pointing out relevant issues in the social and political areas, as well as other authors in the field, in order to build emancipatory knowledge. The thesis also sought to present and analyze the work of the Third Sector, as well as its developments, based on the partnership between the public sector and the private initiative. To achieve these goals, this work sought to use perception and observation, in addition to testimonies that were presented over eight years of experience, dialogues, experiences, and also the realization of the social projects of Institute Superar, currently reframed and in transition to the Incluir Institute. Through this perspective, we seek to apprehend and interpret the phenomena of inclusion and exclusion in those institutions, without losing the focus of this thesis, through two perspectives: inclusive educational policies and practices. Over the course of the research, during the meetings, disagreements and dialogues, it was possible to identify the tensions, contradictions, knowledge and actions of the reality of inclusion versus exclusion that our society experiences daily. Finally, we found that the research carried out in the Third Sector revealed its role in promoting inclusion within an extremely exclusive and strongly bureaucratic structure of the State, in addition to being radically hierarchical. This reflects the challenge and the effort that was to promote the debate on inclusion within the public-private perspective, and that it is possible to affirm its contribution to the humanization, transformation, and democratization of the inclusive process, while still giving light to each context and reality that they must be objects of critical meditation.