Cocar e Universidade: um paradigma híbrido

Abstract

This research was performed in order to discuss issues such as cultural transformation, hybridization, migration studies and resistance movements of ethnic groups in the state of Rio de Janeiro. The context containing these relations in the State of Rio de Janeiro's Maracanã the Village which is characterized as urban, and composed of migrant families from other states, victims of land disputes. Being an urban village, its inhabitants have daily contact with non- Indian and foreign cultures, and you can move from this appropriation and cultural transformation. From this circumstance, this research aims to answer about it is possible to foster the goal of " Indigenous University " in line with the proposal of the State is building a " Reference Centre of Indigenous Peoples " in the space of the ancient palace the Indian’s Museum . This projection is based on measuring the Law 11.645/2008? Be able to answer or not to demands expressed in the indigenous intercultural education? To answer questions about, research is outlined as a qualitative and privileges, such as data collection techniques to semi - structured interviews and discourse analysis. The universe of the study consists of the indigenous people and their leaders in the resistance that remain the Maracanã Village, the ancient Indian’s Museum, in Saint Kitts neighborhood in Rio de Janeiro. Your sample clipping comprises five indigenous leaders who lived in this village. Having as parameter the ethnographic observations where the activities taking place in the village were described , as well as other narratives, or fragments of narratives both indigenous and other supporters. In the course of the text, will cover topics such as the history of the building of the ancient Indian’s Museum, the literature review supports the view that what this is about culture, multiculturalism, interculturalism and indigenous education. Then the discussion about the need for the Indians to think in an urban context, encompassing contributory to this diaspora that are conflict and migration factors. Nevertheless, the indigenous perspective is called in the text, where I analyze the content of speech and confrontation with the data recorded in the field notebook, as well as my own experience in the field. Thus the conclusion is possible, as the practical and theoretical correlation has been established, indicating the data discussed and reflected critically.